Eotyrannus - Facts and Figures

Name: Eotyrannus (Greek for dawn tyrant); pronounced EE-oh-tih-RAN-us Habitat: Woodlands of Western Europe Historical Period: Early Cretaceous (125-120 million years ago) Size and Weight: About 15 feet long and 300-500 pounds Diet: Meat Distinguishing Characteristics: Small size; relatively long arms with grasping hands About Eotyrannus The tiny tyrannosaur Eotyrannus lived during the early Cretaceous period, about 50 million years before more famous relatives like Tyrannosaurus Rex--and, following a common theme in evolution, this dinosaur was much smaller than its giant descendant (the same way the first, mouse-sized mammals of the Mesozoic Era were much smaller than the whales and elephants that evolved from them). In fact, the 300- to 500-pound Eotyrannus was so slender and wiry, with relatively long arms and legs and grasping hands, that to the untrained eye it might look more like a raptor; the giveaway is the lack of single, giant claws on each of its hind feet, as sported by the likes of Velociraptor and Deinonychus. (One paleontologist speculates that Eoraptor was actually a non-tyrannosaur theropod closely related to Megaraptor, but this idea is still being digested by the scientific community.) One of the most remarkable things about Eotyrannus is that its remains were discovered on Englands Isle of Wight--western Europe isnt exactly famous for its tyrannosaurs! From an evolutionary point of view, however, this makes sense: we know that the earliest tyrannosaurs (like the 25-pound, feathered Dilong) lived a few million years before Eotyrannus in eastern Asia, while the largest tyrannosaurs (like the multi-ton T. Rex and Albertosaurus) were indigenous to late Cretaceous North America. One possible scenario is that the very first tyrannosaurs migrated west from Asia, quickly evolving to Eotyrannus-like sizes, and then reached the culmination of their development in North America. (A similar pattern held with horned, frilled dinosaurs, the tiny progenitors of which originated in Asia and then made their way westwards to North America, spawning multi-ton genera like Triceratops.)

My Personal Strengths And Weaknesses - 916 Words

When I think of my personal strengths and weaknesses in school, finding the time to study, always seems to fall on the weaker side. I find myself knowing when I can study and focus the best but rarely following through with studying during those times. My major strength has always been my motivation once I begin. I can sit down to do a project with the intention of finishing it within that single sitting. I become extremely focused and efficient to complete the project or finish the goal I have set for myself. The problem is that I don’t often sit down in a quiet environment to focus on the work needing done. For example, I will sit down to do chemistry homework late at night because I procrastinate it all day; instead of getting up before my morning class and doing it when I am more alert and better able to focus. The time management project opened my eyes to all the improvements that I can make to how I can better manage my time. My personal study habits consisted of sitting down at my dining room table with my laptop. I normally try to write all of my notes down on paper and go back through to highlight important information. When I am sitting down to study it is normally after a day of classes with about 4 or more people sitting in my living room with me. We all try to get our homework done but soon after starting one or two want to stop and just talk. If I’m not studying in my dining room I sometimes try to hide out in my room to get quiet and focus on typing any papersShow MoreRelated My Personal Strengths and Weaknesses Essay792 Words   |  4 Pageslearning experience and being able to recognize our own strengths and weaknesses can help us become better individuals in anything we choose to do, whether it is positive abilities and skills that can help achieve our goals or negative personal areas that need improvement. Knowing yourself and what you can do, can help you recognize and overcome your weaknesses.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  One of my greatest strengths at work that I have recognized would have to be my ability to be a well-organized individual. I tend toRead MorePersonal Statement : My Strengths And Weaknesses863 Words   |  4 Pagesevaluate my listening skills, assess my strengths and weaknesses, and describe how I can improve my skills. My listening self-assessment score of 36 indicates that, although my skill level is decent, I have room to improve significantly. I regularly attend professional meetings where either informational listening or critical listening is required. Despite this, I consider my listening skills subpar and am aware of my need for improvement. In understanding how I can improve, I must first assess my strengthsRead MorePersonal Strengths And Weaknesses Of My Working Style1450 Words   |  6 PagesDiscuss your working style, including two personal strengths and two personal weaknesses that relate to your working style. My working style very from job too job but I think and and can be summed up by saying that I am extremely dependable and flexible. I rarely miss a day of work; in the last three years I have missed one day of work and that was related a serious family matter. Also I am on time regardless of the event. Being punctuate is appreciated by most but if you are attendingRead MoreMy Personal Strengths and Weaknesses in Netball Essay1696 Words   |  7 PagesI consider are my strengths and weaknesses for Netball and why I think each one is a strength or weakness. Strengths Weaknesses Shooting Shoulder Pass Bounce Pass Chest Pass Pivoting Footwork High-running Pass Reaction Time Agility Speed Strengths: Strength 1: Shooting is one of my strengths as I think I perform it correctly. By correctly I mean having a balanced position (standing with my feet shoulder widthRead MoreEssay about My Personal Strengths and Weaknesses for a Career725 Words   |  3 Pagescannot do will alter what employers and positions there are for you. Throughout my higher education at Full Sail University, I have been able to overcome weaknesses that I have and raised other strengths beyond what I thought I could. Matching what you are good at and not so good at can help shape what your life path will be. Looking deeper into my personal capabilities, I have discovered three strengths and three weaknesses that I have and I’m working on eliminating or improving. If you are not goodRead MorePersonal Strengths and Weaknesses1028 Words   |  5 PagesAn individuals personal strengths and weaknesses are life learning experiences and we all as human beings have different levels strengths and weaknesses. Sometimes a persons strengths and weaknesses may seem very difficult to discuss at times. No one ever wants to admit that they have wea knesses because they are feel ashamed or embarrassed to let others to know that their weaknesses exist. It is best for a person to really know himself or herself in order to accurately evaluate the areas thatRead MorePersonal Strengths and Weaknesses Essay781 Words   |  4 PagesMy Personal Strengths and Weaknesses I believe that life is a learning experience and being able to recognize our own strengths and weaknesses can help us become better individuals in anything we choose to do, whether it is positive abilities and skills that can help achieve our goals or negative personal areas that need improvement. Knowing yourself and what you can do, can help you recognize and overcome your weaknesses. One of my greatest strengths at work that I have recognized would haveRead MoreStrengths and Weaknesses898 Words   |  4 Pagesthis paper is to show you the personal strengths and weakness that I identified by asking friends and family their opinion on the topic regarding yours truly, and by examining myself for areas that I am really good at (also known as strengths) and areas I need to improve (otherwise known as weaknesses). After I have identified them, I will tell you how recognizing my strengths and weakness can help me to improve myself to achieve a more peaceful and satisfying personal life. I will start withRead MoreStrengths and Weaknesses Essay844 Words   |  4 PagesStrengths and Weaknesses Throughout the Mid-SEE I have written reflections on my writing and participated in group activities. I have received comments back from my peers and suggestions to help with revising my paper. With the help of my professor, Professor Church and my classmates, I was able to comprehend their suggestions to me to make my essay better and by revising my classmate’s essays, I was able to point out mistakes that I might have made in my essay, which made myself go back to myRead More Strengths and Weaknesses Essay900 Words   |  4 Pagesthis paper is to show you the personal strengths and weakness that I identified by asking friends and family their opinion on the topic regarding yours truly, and by examining myself for areas that I am really good at (also known as strengths) and areas I need to improve (otherwise known as weaknesses). After I have identified them, I will tell you how recognizing my strengths and weakness can help me to improve myself to achieve a more peaceful and satisfying personal life. I will start with the

Legal Responsibilities of Google for Research - MyAssignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theLegal Responsibilities of Google for Research. Answer: The legal responsibilities of a business are obligations that regulations and laws of the society within which business functions require it to execute. Little difference prevails between the diverse opinions on corporate social responsibility concerning what creates the business' legal responsibilities (Carroll Shabana, 2010). Google is an American international technology organization that specializes in Internet-connected products and services and is required to comply with certain legal responsibilities. Therefore, Google Company has various legal responsibilities that are discussed in this paper. First, Google has the legal responsibility of ensuring that information flows freely. The activities of Google, similar to those of other players in the internet segment, are grounded on the doctrine of the free movement of information (Syodinou, 2012). The freedom of information and liberty of expression, comprising both the right to spread and obtain information, are stated via the freedom to collect information and the autonomy to find, index, and offer links. The strategy of Google to navigate Internet traffic to its numerous applications and services also plays the function of assembling helpful consumer information that is critical for personalizing promotion (Syodinou, 2012). However, the information that flows and is kept in the products and services of Google often correlate to the works safeguarded by copyright or sets up a large portion of a database. For example, the web that is shielded by the creator of the database has sui generis right (Coopers, 2014). A demonstrative example of copyrighted violation by-products of Google in Europe is the Google News of Belgian cases. Concisely, the editors of the Belgian Press gathering society Copiepresse required prohibitory sanction against Google in the year 2006 for having reused, stored, extracted, and reproduced the content of Belgium newspaper in its Google News everyday press review. Google had used the information without consent from editors of Belgium press (Cooper, 2014). Google was found guilty by the court as it had violated both the database and copyright Sui generics on September 5th, 2006. Second, Google has the legal responsibility of allowing automated processing tactics. Through AdWords, the company permits advertisers to choose keywords for the purpose of ensuring that their advertisements get displayed to users of the internet in reply to those keywords being put in the search engine of Google (Syodinou, 2012). However, there has been an issue of keyword's use legality which matches trademarks. For example, pursuant to the conflicting positions articulated in the French case law, the Cassations French Court asked the subsequent basic quizzes to Justices European Court: First, if the Googles use, within its AdWords advertising structure, of keywords analogous to trademarks made a breach of those trademarks (Syodinou, 2012). The other important question was if Google could be freed from liability upon the basis of the E-commerce Directive's Article 14, in which case it was innocent of the breach. The Court on 23rd March 2010, ruled that while Google was functioning trades course, it was not utilizing the trademarks for its self-advertising service and thus it was impossible to hold it liable for trademark contravention (Syodinou, 2012). In the second main issue, the Court concluded that E-commerce Directives Article 14 ought to be construed as denoting that that the law stated therein relates to an internet service-giver within cases where that service giver has not done its functional role of such a type as to offer control over, or knowledge of, the stored data. Google Corporations third legal responsibility is to protect the users privacy. The companys privacy policy articulates three important elements. The first element is the information collected by Google (Synodinou, 2012; Google Registry, 2014). Google collects information in two ways comprising of information given by users and information it obtains from the use of its services by users. The second element is the manner the collected information is used. Google uses the collected information from Registry services of Google to improve, provide, protect, maintain and advance new services, as well as to safeguard Google Registry and her users. When one contacts Google Registry, your communications record might be stored (Google Registry, 2014). Your email address might be used to notify you about Googles services and send you administrative messages. Moreover, Google Registry might process private information on servers within multiple nations all over the earth. The company can store, transfer, and or process someones private information on a server situated in a foreign country. The other element is logging on and updating personal information (Holland, 2010). Whenever Google services are utilized, the firm aims to give you access to your private information. When that information is erroneous, Google tries to offer you means of quickly updating it or deleting it unless you have to store that information for legal purposes or legitimate business (Cooper, 2014). The fourth legal responsibility of Google is removing search results. For example, in Europe, the company has started removing search outcomes for searches on some persons in adherence to a contentious court declaration that inaugurated the purported right to be disremembered (Too, 2014). The European Union Justices Court ruled that it is the responsibility of Google to get rid of irrelevant or outdated search outcomes held by the third parties. The Corporations fifth legal responsible is to ensure that all suppliers in their entire activities follow the regulations, rules, and laws of the nations within which they operate. For example, Google is devoted to safeguarding the workers human rights and treating them with dignity and respect as the international community fathoms. This applies to every employee, comprising direct employees, students, temporary, contractual, migrant, and any other kind of employee (Panmore Institute, 2017; Google, 2015). The organization is legally responsible for safety and health of all people involved in its business. This is its sixth major responsibility (Google Inc., 2015). In this case, suppliers are obliged to know that in addition to reducing the occurrence of work-related illness and injury, a healthy and safe working condition improves the services and products quality, production consistency, and employee retention and morale (Google.org, 2014). A supplier is as well required to recognize that ongoing worker education and input is valuable to recognizing and solving safety and health issues at the place of work (Shenkar, et al., 2014). The safety and health standards are, but not limited to emergency preparedness, food, housing and sanitation, and physically challenging work. Googles other legal responsibility of taking care of the environment. The company believes that environmental responsibility is central to manufacturing unique products (Google Inc., 2014). Within manufacturing operations, a supplier would lessen adverse impacts on the natural resources, environment, and community while protecting the public's safety and health. The ecological standards include product content limitations, environmental management systems, and resource efficiency among others (Ioakimidis et al., 2006). In conclusion, Google has the legal responsibility to certain things, and, therefore, it cannot ignore these duties. The corporation has the legal responsibility to ensure that information flows freely. The freedom of information and liberty of expression stated via the freedom to collect information and the autonomy to find, index, and offer links. Googles other responsibility is to allow automated processing tactics, protect the users privacy, and remove search results. The European Union Justices Court ruled that it is the responsibility of Google to get rid of irrelevant or outdated search outcomes held by the third parties. Additionally, the company has the legal duty to create a healthy working environment for its employees, ensure that all it suppliers follow the regulations, rules, and laws of the nations within which they operate observed, and take care of the environment. References Carroll, A. B Shabana, K. M. (2010). The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research, and Practice. International Journal of Management. 86-105. Cooper, D. (2014). Google, the CJEU, and the Long Arm of the European Data Protection Law.Retrieved https://www.insideprivacy.com/advertising-marketing/online/google-spain- data-protection-ruling-extends-eu-privacy-law/ Google Inc. (2014). Google Inc. Form 10-K, 2014. Retrieved https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1288776/000128877615000008/goog2014123110-k.htm Google Registry. (2017). Privacy Policy. Retrieved https://www.registry.google/about/privacy.html Google. (2015). Responsible Manufacturing. Retrieved https://www.google.com/about/responsible-manufacturing.html Google.org. (2015). Data-driven, Human-focused Philanthropy Powered by Google. Retrieved https://www.google.org/ Holland, C. (2010). The Google Settlement: a Brief Overview. Legal Information Management, 10(03), 181-183. doi:10.1017/s147266961000068x Ioakimidis, M., Stergioulas, A., Tripolitsioti, A. (2006). Environmental resposibility in the sport industry. Choregia, 103-116. doi:10.4127/ch.2006.2.1-2.103-116 Panmore Institute. (2017). Google Stakeholders Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Retrieved https://panmore.com/google-stakeholders-corporate-social-responsibility-csr- analysis Shenkar, O et al. (2014). International Business. London: Routledge. Synodinou, T. (2012). Google versus the Law. Retrieved https://www.worldfinancialreview.com/?p=1546 Toor, Amar. (2014). Google Begins Removing Search Results Under Right to Be Forgotten Law. Retrieved https://www.theverge.com/2014/6/26/5844982/google-begins-removing- search-results-under-EU-right-to-be-forgotten

What contributions did Ford and Taylor make to the organisation of work Essay Example

What contributions did Ford and Taylor make to the organisation of work? Essay Organisations, like organisms, evolve over time. Understanding the nature of organisations and how they have changed helps us to better understand the purpose of managerial work. Contributions to organisational work are based on past events which are unlikely to be recreated in their entirety, thus rendering the strategy less efficient than it was in the original situation. The implementation of classical management theory was the main focus of works by Taylor and Fayol, with business managers such as Ford being heavily influenced by these ideas. Though Taylors concepts have been fundamental for the organisational structure of some post-industrialist firms as well as current ones, I believe the way in which they have been implemented is flawed as it indicates that the strategies only work for a narrow range of firms. The inception of scientific management Taylors principles of scientific management (Taylor in Pugh, D, 1990) were based on the assumption that workers put in as little effort as possible into their work just to earn money. Hypothetically, if this assumption were true, the evaluative arguments of Taylors ideas being too harsh may not have existed; but shifting all the responsibility for the organisation from the worker to the manager, monitoring each workers progress and encouraging the efficiency of workers by relating pay to performance led to an employee backlash. The severity of his ideas even meant that some governments forbade the use of Taylorism in a firms management structure. We will write a custom essay sample on What contributions did Ford and Taylor make to the organisation of work? specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on What contributions did Ford and Taylor make to the organisation of work? specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on What contributions did Ford and Taylor make to the organisation of work? specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Fords impact on the automobile industry was a visible manifestation of the visible hand (Chandler, 1977) of management. Although the continuous assembly line was a vital part of mass production, improvements in technology enabled small car components to be made accurately and the interchangeability of parts and the simplicity of attaching them together (Womack et al, 1990, p.26) allowed for a more efficient car-making process to emerge. The single purpose machine tools churned out standardised parts that didnt need to be adapted for every car by skilled workers, giving rise to the interchangeable worker. The pace of the conveyor belt of the assembly line set the pace of work the factory, permitting managers to focus on other ways to improve the firm rather than focusing on productivity and efficiency. As labour costs were a significant proportion of Fords costs, reducing the need for a specifically trained workforce led to a massive fall in the value of luxury cars, bringing a large part of the population in the US and UK into effective demand. Taylors theories are also based on the assumption that there is one best method in which an action can be undertaken, and all that is necessary is research into situation to find such a method, hence the name, scientific management. Not only has this strategy worked for the automobile industry, current examples can be seen in large chain restaurants and coffee shops such as Starbucks, as well as in the service sector. Buchanan and Huczynski (2001) identified telephone service jobs as a classic example of a job that required one specific procedure, in the form of customised call scripts, which can be followed. Fast food restaurant and call centre jobs have a high level of monotony, leading to passive workers who have little or no room to climb up the career ladder and tailor their own jobs. Focusing primarily on cutting costs by finding the most efficient method of production led to the downfall of scientific management and the rise of the people-orientated approach. The demise of scientific management Not being able to find the best way of producing a product or providing a service renders Taylors strategies impracticable. Ford tried to repeat the success of the Model T in the UK after the boom in car sales in the US; however, he did not foresee the strength on the trade unions in the UK. The labour market in the UK was inflexible and unable to adapt to the dehumanising nature of Fords factories. Although forcing workers to follow work ethic in a mindless and unquestioning manner improved the speed, precision and efficiency of production, the Model T failed to attract a large market in the UK. After sacking union workers and not listening to UK managers, Ford introduced the Model A which was better adapted to suit potential customers. This was one of the first proofs that Taylors concepts were only effective on a narrow range of non-complex industries, in which the best method of production could definitely be found after research. Tolliday (1992) noted that Fords successes were primarily based on Fords conception of fitting everything together, thus facilitating the advancements in technology and gifted mechanics to produce the Model T for a large market. I think that his success was partly down to luck as there was a constant supply of new workers in Detroit to make up for the 70% of workers that quit in the first week of Fords moving new assembly line manufacturing system. Additionally, in Buchanan and Huczynskis (2001) analysis of Taylor, they mention how he understates the complexity of what management is and what exactly managers do, and his basic assumptions that pay is a driving factor for work has been proven wrong by the Hawthorne experiment. The results demonstrated that labour has become a crucial part of the firm as, even though the experiment failed men, women joined an institution to become part of a team and forming a social aspect with co-workers outside of working hours. The need for recognition and belonging was a motivating factor in getting more women into the workforce. I think that without fully understanding the market and what managers do, commenting on how different models contribute towards organisational behaviour and their relative successes is futile. Defining management as an exact science or profession is difficult (Mintzberg, 1975, p.53) as decisions are not always taken rationally but are based on judgement and intuition. Whether this decision is good or bad can only be told in retrospect. Conclusions Increasing consumer choice and individuality of products as well as the growing complexity of markets and goods makes it harder to implement Taylorist principles. The further you move from standardisation and mass production using specialised machinery, Taylors theories begin to seem too extreme and thus would fail no matter how you tried to execute them. Given the political, social and cultural changes since Taylor first created the notion of scientific management, his theories seem of limited relevance compared to their significance at the time.