Drug Test Benefits

Recent increases in the phthisis of illegal do drugss and problems related to that utilisation become raised a figure of human beings health and galosh concerns. These concerns have led numerous to point drug interrogation as one of the best ways to combat the proliferation of drug use. Although the focus is scrutiny for drugs, it is worth noning that similar calls for increased shewing has risen due to the spread of HIV and the threat it poses to those uncovered to it. Cl earlier, these public health and safety concerns conflict with privacy claims of those being targeted for testing.Nevertheless, many view the public safety threat as serious enough to override completely any individual privacy interests. Indeed, public opinion polls indicate that in that location is widespread put up for a variety of testing chopines, flat those that argon random and mandatory. Although drug abuse should not be tolerated in the getplace, c are essential(prenominal) be taken t o limit the extent to which drug testing intrudes on people=s privacy. The idea is to use the technology carefully, with adequate plainlyification, and with enough safeguards and precautions to ensure that testing is done thoughtfully and responsibly.Both the government and hole-and-corner(a) business represent that they have a substantive interest in testing citizens and employees for a variety of reasons. First, they can fight the Adrug emailprotected by weeding out users and stopping drug use. Second, they can ensure safety by revealing conditions that pose a serious threat to co- lasters or the public. Third, they test employees so they can insist a fully responsive and progenyive workforce. Fourth, they can identify those who volition be unable to work in the future. Fifth, it leave alone help reduce the cost of employee health care plans.Finally, drug testing exit help maintain public confidence in the integrity and trustworthiness of their operations. Many insurance agencies argue that testing is necessary be pay off it fundamentally causes the healthier employees to pay higher premiums to cover the costs of the coverage for those who are at greater risk levels. All of these arguments provide strong reasons to consider drug testing. In virtually industries, such as health care and transportation, even casual drug or alcohol use can result in not only increased costs, but also in lawsuits and expiration of life.Even if the employee is not chemically dependent, a spouse or family member using drugs or alcohol can mean missed work, extensive personal phone calls and increased dependent medical benefits. compulsory court justice Antonin Scalia found drug testing to be an invasion of privacy and a do of A needless indignity. He states that if a blood test is used, it get hold ofs puncturing the skin. If a urinalysis is utilized, the sample must just abouttimes be gained downstairs direct observation to guard against drug-free substitution s and falsification of results.He feels that in that location are more effective methods of identifying drug users. For example, a daily observation of moods, behavior, and productivity, can detect drug use and be dealt with immediately. Many employees feel that implementing a drug testing program will spring up to the lack of trust between the employer and employee. They feel that this will cause high turnover rates from course of instruction to year. It will also lower employee morale and effectiveness while on the job. These problems could be avoided by just utilizing the observance plan mention earlier.Opponents of drug testing also focuses on the limitations of the testing procedures, arguing that the tests are highly inaccurate. One worry is the sensitivity of the tests. Many types of tests procedure inaccurate, innocent parties will be harmed because just about tests produce a large number of false positive results, indicating that on that point has been drug use when th ere has actually been none. Such false positive results can rise from the use of medications, passive inhalation of marijuana smoke, or the technology employed for many drug tests.Drug testing opposers cite the human wrongdoing of lab personnel that further implicates the accuracy of results The first two cases on drug testing to have the Supreme Court were argued in 1988. From the decisions issued the following year, it is clear that the court held that urine tests are a significant intrusion into a fundamentally private domain. Since then, every(prenominal) court that has addressed the issue has found that urinalysis and blood tests intrude on privacy as a search and seizure forbidden on a lower floor the fourth amendment.Courts have mainly focused on the privacy invasion involved, first, in the process of micturition and the manner in which the specimen is obtained, and second, in the individuals interest and safeguarding the confidentiality of the information contained in the sample. While drug tests efficiency also violate the fifth amendment protection of due process and constitutional privacy interests, courts have taken the privacy claims of the fourth amendment to be the nearly forceful constitutional threat.Some surveys show employees strongly actualize drug testing because it promises greater safety and harmony at work. However, scores of civil suits in the early and mid 1980s challenged the procedure as an invasion of privacy. The courts have upheld most testing programs, and fewer suits are promptly being filed. In a study conducted by the society for Human Resources Management, human resource professionals most consistently favored the use of drug and alcohol testing, soliciting criminal record checks, and monitoring visual display, pole keystrokes and phone activity.While employers may deem these activities as essential to preserve workplace safety and productivity, many employees would argue that they violate their privacy, both on t he job and at home. Employees may not be invaded by having to participate in drug tests with the urinalysis. Technology has advanced so that any impairment in a workers military operation while on the job due to drugs or alcohol will be monitored on computers. It is called performance or impairment testing by its creators, and is a game-like device that can test head and motor coordination by the ability to manipulate a cursor on a VDT screen.The benefits reveal the cause of an employee impairment. Performance tests would offer more privacy to the worker and promote a less hostile milieu People have objected mostly to random drug testing, which is mainly limited to government and private jobs that effect public safety, like those at nuclear power plants, airlines, railroads and trucking companies. More than 90 percent of the testing is of job applicants. But most of these same companies also test after accidents and when suspicions are aroused through erratic behavior.Fewer than 10 percent of the companies test randomly or at the time of one-year physicals An employer has an extreme amount of influence on an individual to receive some type of treatment for their addiction. They are in the position to provide incentive for accepting treatment, as well as emotional support afterwards, because the job usually is of extreme importance to the addicted individual. The management should offer and accessible health insurance plan so that when the employee needs to receive the treatment that they can easily do so without having to involve several other people erstwhile the addict has received the infallible care, their job structure should be altered by management. They should be placed in a less strainingful atmosphere. Their amount of work decreases for a certain amount of time, and they should not be placed on a demanding quota schedule that could turn on an emotional swing back toward the addiction The key to this success is having a good prevention program in place to detect problems at an early stage in their development. If these problems can be spy early then outpatient treatment can be successful, says Maureen Whitmore of Occupational Health Services in Larkspur, California.Once a company has invested their time and money in rehabilitation of the employee, there are steps that must be followed to keep the employee from returning to their addiction. First, a peer support group should be provided where open word is encouraged in trying to cope with a new life and the new found thrust of work. Second, management should help their employees reintegrate back into the workplace. They will be confused and easily persuaded by stress that might have led to the problem in the beginning.Third, the company should hold AA meetings on-site and provide a crisis number to call in case of an emergency. Fourth, supervisors should be educated to watch for returning signs that the person is under stress. Fifth, management should involve family me mbers and provide lifestyle education. Finally, stress reduced activities should be offered on-site, such as aerobic exercise and fitness classes, and workshops on how to improve interpersonal skills. I feel that employee drug testing in some manner is essential to the performance and effectiveness of an employee in a company.Management needs the assurance that every employee is doing their job without any type of impairment from an outside source. However, I also feel that urinalysis testing is an invasion of privacy. As an employer, I will not be concerned with what types of drugs the employee is taking, but he is impairing the performance of the company. As I mentioned earlier, technology has advanced in such a manner that there will be no need for urinalysis tests. Performance or impairment testing programs will test the employee=s judgement and motor coordination through the ability to manipulate a cursor on a VDT screen.This will provide the employer with accurate information on the abilities of the employee to perform their job. It also keeps the employees addiction private and not for their employers to know. I feel that the increased health insurance coverage and the increased ease of access for employees will help them seek treatment for their addiction. However, there will need to be severe disciplinary actions for those who continually test positive. Once an employee has received treatment, the follow-up plans must be persuaded by management.This should help the employee to receive the needed attention for their problem, and help the company continue to have an effective employee. Drug testing has many benefits and aline backs for both employers and employees. Certain types of drug testing are necessary in to days workplace for there to be an increased effectiveness of a company on their industry. However, employees still have privacy rights that cannot be infringed upon. A good and successful detection program and rehabilitation program are essen tial to the survival of the fittest of the employee in the workplace. Eventually, the drug addiction will impair their abilities for life.